Peritoneal carcinomatosis

Prognosis and survival in peritoneal carcinomatosis

What the figures you have found actually say, which patients they describe, and what changes where you sit within them.

If you have come here looking for how long people live with peritoneal carcinomatosis, the first thing worth saying is that almost every figure you will find online is misused: it is given without saying which tumour of origin it refers to, what year it comes from, or what treatment those patients had received. Those three things change the result more than anything else.

This page gives the numbers with all three labels attached. Not all of them are pleasant to read, and none of them has been softened.

Before any figure: what a median is

Almost all survival data is reported as a median. A median of twenty-two months does not mean “you have twenty-two months”. It means that, in that group of patients, half went past it and half did not.

Where you fall on that curve is not something the number can tell you. There are patients at the long end of every one of these series, and there are patients at the short end. The median is where the group splits, not a date.

The second figure you will see is five-year survival, as a percentage: out of a hundred patients in that group, how many were alive five years later. It is more informative than the median where there is a long tail of survivors — which is exactly what happens in some of these diseases.

What weighs most, in order

Three factors explain most of the difference between one patient and another, and only the third depends on a decision.

  • The tumour of origin. An appendiceal pseudomyxoma is not a gastric adenocarcinoma; the distance between the two ends of this page is measured in years, not months.
  • The specific biology of the tumour. Within the same origin, histology changes the prognosis: signet-ring cells, for instance, worsen the outcome even with little disease and a flawless operation.
  • Whether the cytoreduction is complete. This is the factor that does lie with the team and with when surgery happens, and it typically doubles or triples median survival.

The weight of complete versus incomplete cytoreduction as an independent predictor: set out in the author's monograph, drawing on the series cited below.

The figures, with their labels attached

Appendiceal origin and pseudomyxoma peritonei. The best scenario, by some distance. With complete cytoreduction and low-grade histology, five-year survival was 86%. In a pooled analysis of 2,298 patients from sixteen centres, median survival was 196 months — over sixteen years — and 63% were alive at ten.

Peritoneal mesothelioma. With systemic treatment alone, the historical median is six to twelve months. In the international registry of 405 patients treated with cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, the median was 53 months and 47% were alive at five years. With one condition: epithelioid subtype. In the sarcomatoid variant the median is under twelve months with any treatment.

Colorectal origin. The trial that opened the field gave 22.4 months with cytoreductive surgery against 12.6 with systemic treatment and palliative surgery. Later series, with better selection, give medians around 30 months and 27% at five years. In the most recent trial, with every patient operated on until the abdomen was clear, both arms reached about 41 months.

Ovarian origin. In stage III interval surgery, adding heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy moved the median from 33.9 to 45.7 months, and ten-year survival from 10.9% to 16.1%.

Gastric origin. This is the hardest scenario and it is better said plainly. In the trial comparing surgery against systemic treatment in limited peritoneal disease, the results were 15.7 against 16.6 months, with serious adverse events in 44% of the surgical arm against 6%, and the study closed early for futility.

Appendiceal: Sugarbaker PH, Chang D. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; pooled analysis of 2,298 patients across 16 centres. Mesothelioma: Yan TD, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009. Colorectal: Verwaal VJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003; Elias D, et al. J Clin Oncol 2010; Quénet F, et al. Lancet Oncol 2021. Ovarian: van Driel WJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2018 and Aronson SL, et al. Lancet Oncol 2023. Gastric: Quik JSE, et al. Lancet Oncol 2026.

The figure that best explains the difference

Of all the numbers on this page, one deserves a second look. In the European series of 506 patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, median survival was 32.4 months where the cytoreduction was complete and 8.4 months where visible disease was left behind.

The same disease, the same surgeons, the same year. The only thing that differed was what stayed inside at closure. Which is why the deciding question in clinic is not how much disease there is, but whether all of it can be removed.

Glehen O, et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 (506 patients, 28 institutions).

What happens without surgery

It is the question almost nobody asks out loud, and it deserves an answer.

In colorectal cancer, the group treated with systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in the landmark trial had a median of 12.6 months. In the pre-oxaliplatin era, peritoneal disease carried the worst prognosis of any metastatic site, with medians of five to seven months.

In peritoneal mesothelioma, the historical median with systemic treatment alone is six to twelve months. In gastric cancer, with modern regimens, around sixteen months in the control arm of the most recent trial.

Systemic treatment has improved since, and any individual case has to account for that improvement. But the order of magnitude is what it is, and it is the reason this surgery exists.

Verwaal VJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003 (control arm). Historical and modern-era series as recorded in the author's monograph. Gastric: control arm of PERISCOPE II, Lancet Oncol 2026.

What can be moved, and what cannot

The tumour of origin cannot be changed, nor can its biology. Where and when it is treated can, and two further things depend on decisions and appear repeatedly in the data.

The first is reaching a high-volume unit before the disease progresses: a complete cytoreduction is more achievable the earlier it is considered. The second is the condition in which a patient arrives at surgery: sarcopenia and malnutrition consistently predict more complications and a worse recovery, and they are among the few variables on this list that can be changed in the weeks beforehand.

Sarcopenia and hypoalbuminaemia as modifiable predictors of major morbidity: the author's monograph.

What this page does not do

None of these figures is your prognosis. They all describe selected groups of patients, treated in experienced centres, under criteria that may not be yours.

An individual prognosis can only be given after seeing the pathology, the imaging and the person. If you came here looking for a date, the honest answer is that the number does not exist: there is a curve, and there is room to move within it.

Frequently asked questions

What patients ask in clinic

What is the life expectancy with peritoneal carcinomatosis?
It depends above all on the tumour of origin and on whether all disease can be removed. In appendiceal pseudomyxoma with complete cytoreduction, 63% of patients were alive at ten years. In operated epithelioid mesothelioma the published median is 53 months. In colorectal origin, around 30 to 41 months depending on the series. In gastric origin, about 16 months, with no demonstrated benefit from surgery. Without cytoreductive surgery, historical medians run from six to thirteen months depending on origin.
I have been given a median survival. Is that how long I have?
No. A median is the point at which half of the group studied had died and half were still alive. It says nothing about where you sit on that curve, and every one of these series has patients at the long end.
What changes the prognosis most?
Three things, in order: the tumour of origin, its specific biology, and whether surgery leaves the abdomen free of visible disease. In the European series of 506 patients, the median was 32.4 months with a complete cytoreduction and 8.4 months where disease was left behind. That is the factor that depends on a decision.
Do the figures I found online apply to me?
Only if they state which tumour of origin they describe, what year they come from and what treatment those patients received. A figure without those three labels tells you nothing: it may come from a series from the 1990s, from a different disease, or from patients who were never operated on.
Is there anything I can do to improve my prognosis?
Two things that do depend on decisions: having the case assessed early by a unit with volume in this disease, because a complete cytoreduction is more achievable the earlier it is considered, and arriving at surgery in the best condition possible. Malnutrition and loss of muscle mass predict more complications and can be changed in the weeks beforehand.

Sources

  1. Verwaal VJ, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and HIPEC versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2003.
  2. Glehen O, et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol, 2004.
  3. Elias D, et al. Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 2010.
  4. Quénet F, et al. Cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC versus cytoreductive surgery alone for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PRODIGE 7). Lancet Oncology, 2021.
  5. van Driel WJ, et al. HIPEC in ovarian cancer (OVHIPEC-1). N Engl J Med, 2018. Aronson SL, et al. Long-term outcomes. Lancet Oncology, 2023.
  6. Sugarbaker PH, Chang D. Results of treatment of 385 patients with peritoneal surface spread of appendiceal malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol, 1999.
  7. Yan TD, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: multi-institutional experience. J Clin Oncol, 2009.
  8. Quik JSE, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC versus systemic treatment alone for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastases (PERISCOPE II). Lancet Oncology, 2026.

Would you like a second opinion?

Send imaging and reports ahead of the visit so the case can be reviewed properly. Patients from outside Madrid and from abroad are seen.